I'm less interested in having the right answer than in helping leaders make better decisions over time.
That means paying attention to how people actually behave under pressure, how systems reinforce or undermine good intentions, and how leadership choices ripple through an organization long after they're made.
A few ideas consistently guide how I work.
What leaders say matters.
What they do matters more.
Teams take their cues from:
If leaders don't model new behaviors, whether that's using AI thoughtfully, making time to think, or changing how decisions get made, adoption will stall, no matter how good the intent.
One of the most common gaps I see is leaders asking teams to change in ways they haven't fully embodied themselves.
Telling people to "work differently" rarely works.
Behavior shifts when:
This is why I focus so much on systems, habits, and environment, not motivation or willpower. Most people want to do good work. The system either enables that or quietly works against it.
These ideas aren't theoretical for me. They're shaped by years of building and leading organizations, making decisions with real consequences, and watching what actually holds up over time.
They guide how I approach AI adoption, leadership enablement, and organizational change, and they shape the kind of partner I am to the leaders I work with.